ICES Database
ElectroMagnetic Field Literature
Search Engine
  

EMF Study
(Database last updated on Mar 27, 2024)

ID Number 671
Study Type In Vivo
Model 2450 MHz (CW) exposure to mice and analysis of reproduction and survival of offspring
Details

C3H mice were exposed to 2450 MHz (CW or AM-100 Hz) MW 6 hr/day 8-wks at SARs of 4 W/kg (whole body average) in semi-restrictive cages (free to move only vertical to the E-field plane) in an anechoic chamber. Core temperatures were slightly but significantly increased by exposure (0.18 +/- 0.03 C). Exposure did not result in a reduction in pregnancy rate, preimplantation or postimplantation survival in pregnant dams or on the chromosomes of male spermatogonia (translocations, univalents, fragments & other exchanges. In an earlier study (Int J Radiat Biol (1986) 50:909-918, Mutation Research (1983) 122:155-161), mice exposed as above for 30 min/day 6 day/wk for 2 weeks showed marginal differences in sperm count, abnormal morphology, decreased pregnancy rate, and chromosome aberrations at high SAR levels, there was no decrease in embryo survival and the authors conclude their observations did not support the reports of germline effects by Manikowska-Czerska, et al. (J Hered (1985) 76:71-73). In another previous study, mice exposed as above for 30 minutes at SARs between 18 and 75 W/kg did show damage in the spermatogenic epithelial tissues with a threshold for spermatocyte reduction of 45 W/kg and an LD50 of 53 W/kg. A similar effect was also observed with non-MW heating in a water bath, however, indicating the results were thermal in nature.

Findings Effects (only at thermal levels)
Status Completed With Publication
Principal Investigator NRPB, UK - richard.saunders@nrpb.org.uk
Funding Agency HPA (NRPB), UK
Country UNITED KINGDOM
References
  • Saunders, RD et al. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., (1988) 53:983-992
  • Blackwell, RP et al. Int J Radiat Biol, (1986) 50:761-787
  • Saunders, RD et al. Mutation Res., (1983) 117:345-356
  • Kowalczuk, CI et al. Mutat. Res., (1983) 122:155-161
  • Saunders, RD et al. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., (1981) 40:623-632
  • Comments

    Return