|
EMF Study
(Database last updated on Mar 27, 2024)
ID Number |
|
2330 |
Study Type |
|
In Vivo |
Model |
|
DNA damage, reactive oxygen species and other endpoints were assessed in quail embryos exposed in ovo to 900 and 1800 MHz. |
Details |
|
AUTHORS' ABSTRACT: Tsybulin et al. 2013 (IEEE #5360): Purpose: Our study was designed to assess the effects of low intensity radiation of a GSM (Global System for Mobile communication) 900 MHz cellular phone on early embryogenesis in dependence on the duration of exposure.
Materials and methods: Embryos of Japanese Quails were exposed in ovo to GSM 900 MHz cellular phone radiation during initial 38 h of brooding or alternatively during 158 h (120 h before brooding plus initial 38 h of brooding) discontinuously with 48 sec ON (average power density 0.25 ¼W/cm2, specific absorption rate 3 ¼W/kg) followed by 12 sec OFF intervals. A number of differentiated somites were assessed microscopically. Possible DNA damage evoked by irradiation was assessed by an alkaline comet assay.
Results: Exposure to radiation from a GSM 900 MHz cellular phone led to a significantly altered number of differentiated somites. In embryos irradiated during 38 h the number of differentiated somites increased (p < 0.001), while in embryos irradiated during 158 h this number decreased (p < 0.05). The lower duration of exposure led to a significant (p < 0.001) decrease in a level of DNA strand breaks in cells of 38-h embryos, while the higher duration of exposure resulted in a significant (p < 0.001) increase in DNA damage as compared to the control.
Conclusion: Effects of GSM 900 MHz cellular phone radiation on early embryogenesis can be either stimulating or deleterious depending on the duration of exposure. |
Findings |
|
Effects |
Status |
|
Completed With Publication |
Principal Investigator |
|
Nat Acad of Sc of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
|
Funding Agency |
|
?????
|
Country |
|
UKRAINE |
References |
|
Tsybulin , O et al. International Journal of Radiation Biology., (2013) 89:756-763
Burlaka, A et al. The Ukrainian Biochemical Journal.
, (2022) 94:95-104
|
Comments |
|
|
Return
|