ICES Database
ElectroMagnetic Field Literature
Search Engine
  

EMF Study
(Database last updated on Mar 27, 2024)

ID Number 2318
Study Type In Vivo
Model Reproductive effects and circadian rhythmicity of melatonin and testosterone in rats and mice exposed to 1800 MHz.
Details

AUTHORS' ABSTRACT: Qin et al. 2013 (IEEE #5329): In this study, we explored the circadian effects of daily radiofrequency field (RF) exposure on reproductive functional markers in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. Animals in circadian rhythm (as indicated by melatonin measurements), were divided into several groups and exposed to 1800 MHz RF at 205 ¼w/cm2 power density (specific absorption rate 0.0405 W/kg) for 2 h/day for 32 days at different zeitgeber time (ZT) points, namely, ZT0, ZT4, ZT8, ZT12, ZT16 and ZT20. Sham-exposed animals were used as controls in the study. From each rat, testicular and epididymis tissues were collected and assessed for testosterone levels, daily sperm production and sperm motility, testis marker enzymes ³-GT and ACP, cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage (p450cc) mRNA expression, and steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) mRNA expression. Via these measurements, we confirmed the existence of circadian rhythms in sham-exposed animals. However, rats exposed to RF exhibited a disruption of circadian rhythms, decreased testosterone levels, lower daily sperm production and sperm motility, down-regulated activity of ³-GT and ACP, as well as altered mRNA expression of cytochrome P450 and StAR. All of these observations were more pronounced when rats were exposed to RF at ZT0. Thus, our findings indicate potential adverse effects of RF exposure on male reproductive functional markers, in terms of both the daily overall levels as well as the circadian rhythmicity. AUTHORS' ABSTRACT: Cao et al. 2015 (IEEE #5918): Background: The potential health risks of exposure to Radiofrequency Fields (RF) emitted by mobile phones are currently of considerable public interest, such as the adverse effects on the circadian rhythmicities of biological systems. To determine whether circadian rhythms of the plasma antioxidants (Mel, GSH-Px and SOD) are affected by RF, we performed a study on male Sprague Dawley rats exposed to the 1.8 GHz RF. Methods: All animals were divided into seven groups. The animals in six groups were exposed to 1.8 GHz RF (201.7 ¼W/cm2 power density, 0.05653 W/kg specific absorption rate) at a specific period of the day (3, 7, 11, 15, 19 and 23 h GMT, respectively), for 2 h/day for 32 consecutive days. The rats in the seventh group were used as sham-exposed controls. At the end of last RF exposure, blood samples were collected from each rat every 4 h (total period of 24 h) and also at similar times from sham-exposed animals. The concentrations of three antioxidants (Mel, GSH-Px and SOD) were determined. The data in RF-exposed rats were compared with those in sham-exposed animals. Results: circadian rhythms in the synthesis of Mel and antioxidant enzymes, GSH-Px and SOD, were shifted in RF-exposed rats compared to sham-exposed animals: the Mel, GSH-Px and SOD levels were significantly decreased when RF exposure was given at 23 and 3 h GMT. Conclusion: The overall results indicate that there may be adverse effects of RF exposure on antioxidant function, in terms of both the daily antioxidative levels, as well as the circadian rhythmicity. AUTHORS' ABSTRACT: Qin et al. 2012 (IEEE #6206): Radiofrequency fields (RF) at 1800 MHz are known to affect melatonin (MEL) and testosterone in male rats, but it remains to be determined whether RF affected circadian rhythm of these plasma hormones. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to 1800-MHz RF at 208 ¼w/cm² power density (SAR: 0.5762 W/kg) at different zeitgeber (ZT) periods of the day, including 0 (ZT0), 4 (ZT4), 8 (ZT8), 12 (ZT12), 16 (ZT16), and 20 (ZT20) h. RF exposure was 2 h/d for 32 d. From each rat, the concentrations of plasma MEL and testosterone were determined in plasma after RF exposure and compared with controls. The results confirmed the existence of circadian rhythms in the synthesis of MEL and testosterone, but revealed an inverse relationship in peak phase of these rhythms. These rhythms were disturbed after exposure to RF, with the effect being more pronounced on MEL than testosterone. The most pronounced effect of RF exposure on MEL and testosterone appears to be in rats exposed to RF at ZT 16 and ZT0 h, respectively. Data suggest that regulation of testosterone is controlled by MEL and that MEL is more sensitive to RF exposure. AUTHORS' ABSTRACT: Qin et al. 2018 (IEEE #7049): Exposure to radiofrequency fields (RF) has been reported to induce adverse effects on testosterone production and its daily rhythm. However, the mechanisms underneath this effect remain unknown. In this study, male mice were exposed to 1800 MHz radiofrequency fields (RF, 40 ¼W/cm2 power intensity and 0.0553 W/Kg SAR) 2 h per day for 32 days. The data suggested that RF exposure: (i) significantly reduced testosterone levels, (ii) altered the expression of genes involved in its synthesis (Star, P450scc, P450c17 and 3²-Hsd) in testicular tissue, (iii) significantly reduced regulatory protein CaMKI/ROR±. Similar observations were also made in cultured primary Leydig cells exposed in vitro to RF. However, all of these observations were blocked by CaMK inhibitor, KN-93, and ionomycin reversed the down-regulation effects on intracellular [Ca2+]i and CaMKI/ROR± expression induced by RF exposure. Thus, the data provided the evidence that RF-induced inhibition of testosterone synthesis might be mediated through CaMKI/ROR± signaling pathway.

Findings Effects
Status Completed With Publication
Principal Investigator Medical College of Soochow U, Suzhou, China
Funding Agency ?????
Country CHINA
References
  • Qin, F et al. Chronobiol Int. , (2014) 31 :123-133
  • Cao, H et al. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health., (2015) 12:2071-2087
  • Qin, F et al. J Toxicol Environ Health A., (2012) 75:1120-1128
  • Qin, F et al. International Journal of Nanomedicine. , (2019) 14:4601-4611
  • Qin, F et al. Chronobiol Int., (2021) 38:1745-1760
  • Comments

    Return