ID Number		1557
Study Type		Engineering & Physics
Model		Induced Current, Contact Current (catch all)
Details		Induced Current, Contact Current (catch all) AUTHORS ABSTRACT: Tell and Tell 2018 (IEEE #6912): Background: Limits for exposure to radiofrequency (RF) contact currents are specified in the two dominant RF safety standards and guidelines developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the International Commission on Non- Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). These limits are intended to prevent RF burns when contacting RF energized objects caused by high local tissue current densities. We explain what contact currents are and review some history of the relevant limits with an emphasis on so-called touch contacts, i.e., contact between a person and a contact current source during touch via a very small contact area. Results: Contact current limits were originally set on the basis of controlling the specific absorption rate resulting from the current flowing through regions of small conductive cross section within the body, such as the wrist or ankle. More recently, contact currents have been based on thresholds of perceived heating. In the latest standard from the IEEE developed for NATO, contact currents have been based on two research studies in which thresholds for perception of thermal warmth or thermal pain have been measured. Importantly, these studies maximized conductive contact between the subject and the contact current source. This factor was found to dominate the response to heating wherein high resistance contact, such as from dry skin, can result in local heating many times that from a highly conductive contact. Other factors such as electrode size and shape, frequency of the current and the physical force associated with contact are found to introduce uncertainty in threshold values when comparing data across multiple studies. Conclusions: Relying on studies in which the contact current is minimized for a given threshold does not result in conservative protection limits. Future efforts to develop limits on contact currents should include consideration of (1) the basis for the limits (perception, pain, tissue damage); (2) understanding of the practical conditions of real world exposure for contact currents such as contact resistance, size and shape of the contact electrode and applied force at the point of contact; (3) consistency of how contact currents are applied in research studies across different researchers; (4) effects of frequency.
Findings
Status		Completed With Publication
Principal Investigator
Funding Agency		?????
Country		UNITED STATES
References		Chatterjee, I et al. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., (1986) 33:486-494 Conover, DL et al. Bioelectromagnetics., (1992) 13:103-110 Gandhi, OP et al. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., (1986) 33:757-767 Gao, BQ et al. Bioelectromagnetics., (1992) 13:439-443 Olsen, RG et al. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg., (1994) 9:442-446 Tofani, S et al. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., (1995) 37:96-99 Wilen, J et al. Bioelectromagnetics, (2001) 22:560-567 Kainz, W et al. Phys. Med. Biol., (2003) 48:2551-2560 Johansen, C et al. Am J Epidemiol, (1998) 148:362-368 Kannala, S et al. Health Phys., (2008) 94:161-169 Jokela, K et al. Health Phys, (1994) 66:237-244 Stuchly, MA et al. Phys Med Biol, (1994) 39:1319-1330 Xi, W et al. Appl Comput Electromagn Soc J., (1994) 9:127-134 Cheng, HY et al. Electromagnetics., (2009) 29:13-23 Valic, B et al. Bioelectromagnetics, (2009) 30:591-599 Tell, RA et al. BioMed Eng OnLine., (2018) 17:2-(14 pages) Alanko, T et al. Bioelectromagnetics., (2011) 32:644-651 Jokela, K et al. Health physics., (2011) 100:641-653
Comments